{"id":4920,"date":"2016-04-08T14:36:36","date_gmt":"2016-04-08T14:36:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/leap.staging.ribbitt.com\/evs\/thinking-outside-the-law\/"},"modified":"2023-04-18T20:38:05","modified_gmt":"2023-04-18T20:38:05","slug":"thinking-outside-the-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/leap.staging.ribbitt.com\/evs\/insights\/thinking-outside-the-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Thinking Outside the Law"},"content":{"rendered":"
If a mortgage company didn\u2019t mandate homeowners insurance, would you have it? If states didn\u2019t mandate car insurance, would you have it? If the federal government didn\u2019t mandate health insurance, would you have it? For most business owners and managers, the answer is a big fat \u2018YES\u2019 to all the above as individuals have a desire to protect their investments and hard earned money as much as possible\u2026after all, this premise is the whole reason insurance companies are in business today. <\/p>\n
When it comes to business, shouldn\u2019t business owners do all they can do protect both their investment (the business) and their customers? After all, there are no laws or regulations that mandate security cameras, alarms or even locks on doors\u2026but most businesses have these physical security devices in place. Why should it take the passing of laws and regulation for a business to implement fraud prevention systems to protect unauthorized access to accounts?<\/p>\n